1. norbertrox liked this
  2. fattenedcat liked this
  3. just-evo-now liked this
  4. aripuppyistired liked this
  5. tophatrustla liked this
  6. tencrownss reblogged this from 203y
  7. allhailweegee reblogged this from eat-a-dicker
  8. nicetomeetyouimqueer reblogged this from peppylilspitfuck
  9. nicetomeetyouimqueer liked this
  10. visionarylagger liked this
  11. moral-autism reblogged this from speakertoyesterday and added:
    Also, you’re technically correct that it’s not a First Amendment violation if someone beats me up for admitting that I...
  12. sherlockinmybed liked this
  13. ecliptichorizon liked this
  14. eat-a-dicker reblogged this from 203y
  15. eat-a-dicker liked this
  16. misterjoestar-blog liked this
  17. hazydaytime liked this
  18. hd-cookie liked this
  19. disgruntledval liked this
  20. 203y reblogged this from ecunderbase
  21. cursedwiththevoid liked this
  22. znorton reblogged this from kalice-yuri
  23. znorton liked this
  24. adzolotl liked this
  25. vargamornight reblogged this from stalessiastan
  26. speakertoyesterday reblogged this from drethelin and added:
    They couldn’t have. Another principle of free speech law is prior restraint: you cannot put limits on what a speaker is...
  27. blackhand45 liked this
  28. calliestumbler reblogged this from spiroandthelacktones
  29. calliestumbler liked this
  30. destinationisirrelevant reblogged this from jakeekiss
  31. destinationisirrelevant liked this
  32. inquisitivefeminist liked this
  33. yugiohslav liked this
  34. anvari-lockette-blog liked this
  35. grimusaur liked this
  36. derekscorner reblogged this from godtierwallflower
  37. wretched-stag reblogged this from chandra-nalaar
  38. kawaii-dethu liked this
  39. koishichan liked this
  40. plotdesigner liked this
  41. deaivctivated liked this
  42. manyblinkinglights liked this
  43. silver-and-ivory said: the Brandenburg v Ohio case was about the kkk, not nazis, but otherwise good
  44. thegoodlady liked this
  45. beesmygod posted this